Monaco vs Sur: Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage
Monaco
99.0%
in 2025
Sur
78.0%
in 2025
Monaco rank
1st
Sur rank
2nd
Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage over time
- Monaco
- Sur
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 99.0% against 78.0% in Sur, a difference of 21.0%.
That makes Monaco's figure about 1.3 times Sur's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sur ahead.
Monaco ranks 1st and Sur ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Monaco averaged higher in 1 and Sur in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 59.4% | 81.4% | 22.0% | Sur |
| 2020s | 99.0% | 77.5% | 21.5% | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage, Monaco or Sur?
- Monaco, at 99.0% against 78.0% in Sur as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage between Monaco and Sur?
- 21.0%, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Sur?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Monaco and Sur rank globally for inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage?
- Monaco ranks 1st and Sur ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.