Latvia vs SEAR: Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage
Latvia
99.0%
in 2025
SEAR
94.0%
in 2025
Latvia rank
1st
SEAR rank
2nd
Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage over time
- Latvia
- SEAR
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 99.0% against 94.0% in SEAR, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times SEAR's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 1st and SEAR ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | SEAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 98.2% | 52.6% | 45.6% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 98.3% | 89.5% | 8.8% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage, Latvia or SEAR?
- Latvia, at 99.0% against 94.0% in SEAR as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage between Latvia and SEAR?
- 5.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and SEAR?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and SEAR rank globally for inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage?
- Latvia ranks 1st and SEAR ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.