Latvia vs Mus: Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) … IPV1, WUENIC
Latvia
99.0%
in 2025
Mus
98.0%
in 2025
Latvia rank
1st
Mus rank
1st
Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) … IPV1, WUENIC over time
- Latvia
- Mus
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 99.0% against 98.0% in Mus, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 1st and Mus ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 98.2% | 77.2% | 21.0% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 98.3% | 96.3% | 2.0% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage, Latvia or Mus?
- Latvia, at 99.0% against 98.0% in Mus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage between Latvia and Mus?
- 1.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mus?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Mus rank globally for inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage?
- Latvia ranks 1st and Mus ranks 1st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.