High income (World Bank) vs Latvia: Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage
High income (World Bank)
97.0%
in 2025
Latvia
99.0%
in 2025
High income (World Bank) rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st
Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage over time
- High income (World Bank)
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 99.0% against 97.0% in High income (World Bank), a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Latvia ahead.
High income (World Bank) ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 17 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income (World Bank) | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 96.6% | 98.2% | 1.6% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 96.5% | 98.3% | 1.8% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage, High income (World Bank) or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 99.0% against 97.0% in High income (World Bank) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage between High income (World Bank) and Latvia?
- 2.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income (World Bank) and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do High income (World Bank) and Latvia rank globally for inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage?
- High income (World Bank) ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.