EUR vs Latvia: Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage
EUR
94.0%
in 2025
Latvia
99.0%
in 2025
EUR rank
2nd
Latvia rank
1st
Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage over time
- EUR
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 99.0% against 94.0% in EUR, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times EUR's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
EUR ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 1st of 17 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | EUR | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 87.2% | 98.2% | 11.0% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 94.0% | 98.3% | 4.3% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage, EUR or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 99.0% against 94.0% in EUR as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage between EUR and Latvia?
- 5.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for EUR and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do EUR and Latvia rank globally for inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage?
- EUR ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 1st of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.