El Salvador vs SEAR: Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage
El Salvador
99.0%
in 2025
SEAR
94.0%
in 2025
El Salvador rank
1st
SEAR rank
2nd
Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage over time
- El Salvador
- SEAR
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 99.0% against 94.0% in SEAR, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times SEAR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was SEAR ahead.
El Salvador ranks 1st and SEAR ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | SEAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 75.2% | 52.6% | 22.6% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 96.3% | 89.5% | 6.8% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage, El Salvador or SEAR?
- El Salvador, at 99.0% against 94.0% in SEAR as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage between El Salvador and SEAR?
- 5.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and SEAR?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and SEAR rank globally for inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (ipv1) immunization coverage?
- El Salvador ranks 1st and SEAR ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.