Malaysia vs Rwanda: Monitoring of sustainable tourism
Malaysia
7 tables
in 2023
Rwanda
7 tables
in 2023
Malaysia rank
10th
Rwanda rank
10th
Monitoring of sustainable tourism over time
- Malaysia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 7 tables against 7 tables in Rwanda, a difference of 0 tables.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 10th of 176 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7 tables | 0 tables | 7 tables | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 7.2 tables | 4.2 tables | 3 tables | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 7 tables | 7 tables | 0 tables | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monitoring of sustainable tourism, Malaysia or Rwanda?
- Malaysia, at 7 tables against 7 tables in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monitoring of sustainable tourism between Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 0 tables, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for monitoring of sustainable tourism?
- Malaysia ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 10th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Tourism (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Monitoring of sustainable tourism. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of standardized data tables implemented within the Tourism Satellite Account (TSA) and System of Environmental and Economic Accounts (SEEA) to track tourism's economic and environmental impacts.