Curaçao vs Namibia: Monitoring of sustainable tourism
Curaçao
2 tables
in 2022
Namibia
2 tables
in 2020
Curaçao rank
62nd
Namibia rank
62nd
Monitoring of sustainable tourism over time
- Curaçao
- Namibia
How they compare
Curaçao currently reports 2 tables against 2 tables in Namibia, a difference of 0 tables.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Namibia ahead.
Curaçao ranks 62nd and Namibia ranks 62nd of 176 countries.
Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curaçao | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2 tables | 1.2 tables | 0.8 tables | Curaçao |
| 2020s | 2 tables | 2 tables | 0 tables | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monitoring of sustainable tourism, Curaçao or Namibia?
- Curaçao, at 2 tables against 2 tables in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in monitoring of sustainable tourism between Curaçao and Namibia?
- 0 tables, with Curaçao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Curaçao and Namibia rank globally for monitoring of sustainable tourism?
- Curaçao ranks 62nd and Namibia ranks 62nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Tourism (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Monitoring of sustainable tourism. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of standardized data tables implemented within the Tourism Satellite Account (TSA) and System of Environmental and Economic Accounts (SEEA) to track tourism's economic and environmental impacts.