Aruba vs Mongolia: Monitoring of sustainable tourism
Aruba
0 tables
in 2022
Mongolia
0 tables
in 2020
Aruba rank
97th
Mongolia rank
97th
Monitoring of sustainable tourism over time
- Aruba
- Mongolia
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 tables against 0 tables in Mongolia, a difference of 0 tables.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Mongolia ahead.
Aruba ranks 97th and Mongolia ranks 97th of 176 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 tables | 0 tables | 0 tables | — |
| 2010s | 0.6 tables | 0.2 tables | 0.4 tables | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0 tables | 0 tables | 0 tables | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monitoring of sustainable tourism, Aruba or Mongolia?
- Aruba, at 0 tables against 0 tables in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in monitoring of sustainable tourism between Aruba and Mongolia?
- 0 tables, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Mongolia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
- How do Aruba and Mongolia rank globally for monitoring of sustainable tourism?
- Aruba ranks 97th and Mongolia ranks 97th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Tourism (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Monitoring of sustainable tourism. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of standardized data tables implemented within the Tourism Satellite Account (TSA) and System of Environmental and Economic Accounts (SEEA) to track tourism's economic and environmental impacts.