Aruba vs Botswana: Monitoring of sustainable tourism
Aruba
0 tables
in 2022
Botswana
0 tables
in 2020
Aruba rank
97th
Botswana rank
97th
Monitoring of sustainable tourism over time
- Aruba
- Botswana
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 tables against 0 tables in Botswana, a difference of 0 tables.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Botswana ahead.
Aruba ranks 97th and Botswana ranks 97th of 176 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 tables | 3.5 tables | 3.5 tables | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.6 tables | 0.7 tables | 0.1 tables | Botswana |
| 2020s | 0 tables | 0 tables | 0 tables | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monitoring of sustainable tourism, Aruba or Botswana?
- Aruba, at 0 tables against 0 tables in Botswana as of 2022.
- What is the difference in monitoring of sustainable tourism between Aruba and Botswana?
- 0 tables, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Botswana?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
- How do Aruba and Botswana rank globally for monitoring of sustainable tourism?
- Aruba ranks 97th and Botswana ranks 97th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Tourism (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Monitoring of sustainable tourism. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of standardized data tables implemented within the Tourism Satellite Account (TSA) and System of Environmental and Economic Accounts (SEEA) to track tourism's economic and environmental impacts.