Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Nauru: Immunization, measles second dose

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
94.0%
in 2024
Nauru
99.0%
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
1st
Nauru rank
1st

Immunization, measles second dose over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Nauru
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 99.0% against 94.0% in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 5.0%.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Nauru ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 1st of 43 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Nauru Difference Ahead
2000s 88.0% 83.0% 5.0% Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
2010s 88.8% 93.7% 4.9% Nauru
2020s 93.6% 98.6% 5.0% Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher immunization, measles second dose, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Nauru?
Nauru, at 99.0% against 94.0% in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in immunization, measles second dose between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Nauru?
5.0%, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Nauru?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Nauru rank globally for immunization, measles second dose?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 1st of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
WHO and UNICEF (http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/en/), published as Immunization, measles second dose (% of children by the nationally recommended age). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Nauru: Immunization, measles second dose. Statizoid, drawing on WHO and UNICEF (http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/en/). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/immunization-measles-second-dose-percent-of-children-by-the-nationally-recommended-age/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/immunization-measles-second-dose-percent-of-children-by-the-nationally-recommended-age/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/naoero/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Nauru: Immunization, measles second dose</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Immunization, measles second dose (% of children by the nationally recommended age)
Unit
% of children by the nationally recommended age
Source
WHO and UNICEF (http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/en/)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 4,472 data points, 1997–2024
Last refreshed

Child immunization, measles second dose, measures the percentage of children who received two dose of measles containing vaccine according to nationally recommended schedule through routine immunization services in a given year.