East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Iceland: Immunization, measles second dose

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
87.1%
in 2024
Iceland
98.0%
in 2024
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
14th
Iceland rank
15th

Immunization, measles second dose over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Iceland
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 98.0% against 87.1% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 10.9%.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Iceland ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 14th and Iceland ranks 15th of 43 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Iceland Difference Ahead
2000s 52.9% 92.3% 39.4% Iceland
2010s 85.9% 93.9% 8.0% Iceland
2020s 85.7% 74.0% 11.7% East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher immunization, measles second dose, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Iceland?
Iceland, at 98.0% against 87.1% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in immunization, measles second dose between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Iceland?
10.9%, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Iceland?
22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Iceland rank globally for immunization, measles second dose?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 14th and Iceland ranks 15th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
WHO and UNICEF (http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/en/), published as Immunization, measles second dose (% of children by the nationally recommended age). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Iceland: Immunization, measles second dose. Statizoid, drawing on WHO and UNICEF (http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/en/). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/immunization-measles-second-dose-percent-of-children-by-the-nationally-recommended-age/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/immunization-measles-second-dose-percent-of-children-by-the-nationally-recommended-age/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/iceland/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Iceland: Immunization, measles second dose</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Immunization, measles second dose (% of children by the nationally recommended age)
Unit
% of children by the nationally recommended age
Source
WHO and UNICEF (http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/en/)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 4,472 data points, 1997–2024
Last refreshed

Child immunization, measles second dose, measures the percentage of children who received two dose of measles containing vaccine according to nationally recommended schedule through routine immunization services in a given year.