Namibia vs Peru: Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Namibia
40.3%
in 2019
Peru
39.8%
in 2019
Namibia rank
101st
Peru rank
103rd
Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Namibia
- Peru
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 40.3% against 39.8% in Peru, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Peru ahead.
Namibia ranks 101st and Peru ranks 103rd of 193 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.7% | 20.4% | 2.6% | Peru |
| 2000s | 26.7% | 30.4% | 3.7% | Peru |
| 2010s | 36.7% | 39.5% | 2.8% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Namibia or Peru?
- Namibia, at 40.3% against 39.8% in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Namibia and Peru?
- 0.5%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Peru?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Peru rank globally for hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Namibia ranks 101st and Peru ranks 103rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.