Malta vs Sur: Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Malta
71.0%
in 2019
Sur
49.2%
in 2019
Malta rank
5th
Sur rank
2nd
Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Malta
- Sur
How they compare
Malta currently reports 71.0% against 49.2% in Sur, a difference of 21.8%.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times Sur's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 5th and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.9% | 28.6% | 14.3% | Malta |
| 2000s | 56.8% | 39.3% | 17.6% | Malta |
| 2010s | 68.3% | 47.7% | 20.6% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Malta or Sur?
- Malta, at 71.0% against 49.2% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Malta and Sur?
- 21.8%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sur?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Sur rank globally for hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Malta ranks 5th and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.