Jordan vs New Zealand: Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Jordan
53.8%
in 2019
New Zealand
54.1%
in 2019
Jordan rank
52nd
New Zealand rank
50th
Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Jordan
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 54.1% against 53.8% in Jordan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 52nd and New Zealand ranks 50th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32.6% | 32.6% | 0.0% | Jordan |
| 2000s | 42.3% | 45.9% | 3.5% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 51.8% | 53.6% | 1.8% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Jordan or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 54.1% against 53.8% in Jordan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Jordan and New Zealand?
- 0.3%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and New Zealand?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and New Zealand rank globally for hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Jordan ranks 52nd and New Zealand ranks 50th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.