Botswana vs Sri Lanka: Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Botswana
38.4%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
37.5%
in 2019
Botswana rank
107th
Sri Lanka rank
110th
Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Botswana
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 38.4% against 37.5% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Botswana ranks 107th and Sri Lanka ranks 110th of 193 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.6% | 18.0% | 1.4% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 24.7% | 26.8% | 2.1% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 34.4% | 34.6% | 0.3% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Botswana or Sri Lanka?
- Botswana, at 38.4% against 37.5% in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Botswana and Sri Lanka?
- 0.9%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Sri Lanka rank globally for hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Botswana ranks 107th and Sri Lanka ranks 110th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.