AMR vs Iceland: Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
AMR
62.0%
in 2019
Iceland
73.8%
in 2019
AMR rank
2nd
Iceland rank
3rd
Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- AMR
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 73.8% against 62.0% in AMR, a difference of 11.8%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times AMR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was AMR ahead.
AMR ranks 2nd and Iceland ranks 3rd of 17 groups.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43.5% | 44.7% | 1.3% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 53.2% | 61.1% | 7.8% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 60.7% | 71.6% | 10.9% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, AMR or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 73.8% against 62.0% in AMR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between AMR and Iceland?
- 11.8%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Iceland?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AMR and Iceland rank globally for hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- AMR ranks 2nd and Iceland ranks 3rd of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.