AMR vs Canada: Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
AMR
62.0%
in 2019
Canada
76.1%
in 2019
AMR rank
2nd
Canada rank
1st
Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- AMR
- Canada
How they compare
Canada currently reports 76.1% against 62.0% in AMR, a difference of 14.1%.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times AMR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was AMR ahead.
AMR ranks 2nd and Canada ranks 1st of 17 groups.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43.5% | 44.8% | 1.3% | Canada |
| 2000s | 53.2% | 65.7% | 12.5% | Canada |
| 2010s | 60.7% | 75.5% | 14.8% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, AMR or Canada?
- Canada, at 76.1% against 62.0% in AMR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between AMR and Canada?
- 14.1%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Canada?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do AMR and Canada rank globally for hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- AMR ranks 2nd and Canada ranks 1st of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.