Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Sri Lanka
35.8%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
35.7%
in 2019
Sri Lanka rank
122nd
Zimbabwe rank
123rd
Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Sri Lanka
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 35.8% against 35.7% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 193 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.5% | 14.6% | 3.9% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 27.2% | 22.9% | 4.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 33.9% | 32.1% | 1.8% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Sri Lanka or Zimbabwe?
- Sri Lanka, at 35.8% against 35.7% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe rank globally for hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Sri Lanka ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.