Mali vs Sri Lanka: Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with
Mali
35.6%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
35.8%
in 2019
Mali rank
124th
Sri Lanka rank
122nd
Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with over time
- Mali
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 35.8% against 35.6% in Mali, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Mali ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 122nd of 193 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.9% | 18.5% | 3.6% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 21.9% | 27.2% | 5.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 31.2% | 33.9% | 2.7% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with, Mali or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 35.8% against 35.6% in Mali as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with between Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 0.2%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Mali and Sri Lanka rank globally for hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with?
- Mali ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 122nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.