Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Papua New Guinea
10.1%
in 2019
Zambia
9.6%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
153rd
Zambia rank
156th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Zambia
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 10.1% against 9.6% in Zambia, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd and Zambia ranks 156th of 193 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.4% | 1.5% | 2.9% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 5.7% | 2.4% | 3.3% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 8.3% | 6.2% | 2.1% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Papua New Guinea or Zambia?
- Papua New Guinea, at 10.1% against 9.6% in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
- 0.5%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Zambia rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd and Zambia ranks 156th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.