Naoero vs Sri Lanka: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Naoero
15.0%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
15.5%
in 2019
Naoero rank
110th
Sri Lanka rank
109th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Naoero
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 15.5% against 15.0% in Naoero, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Naoero ahead.
Naoero ranks 110th and Sri Lanka ranks 109th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.4% | 4.7% | 3.7% | Naoero |
| 2000s | 10.6% | 9.0% | 1.6% | Naoero |
| 2010s | 13.4% | 13.6% | 0.2% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Naoero or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 15.5% against 15.0% in Naoero as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Naoero and Sri Lanka?
- 0.5%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Naoero and Sri Lanka rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Naoero ranks 110th and Sri Lanka ranks 109th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.