Namibia vs Saudi Arabia: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Namibia
21.5%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
21.3%
in 2019
Namibia rank
75th
Saudi Arabia rank
77th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Namibia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 21.5% against 21.3% in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Namibia ranks 75th and Saudi Arabia ranks 77th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.8% | 4.5% | 0.4% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 9.4% | 8.6% | 0.8% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 17.4% | 17.8% | 0.4% | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Namibia or Saudi Arabia?
- Namibia, at 21.5% against 21.3% in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Namibia and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.2%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Saudi Arabia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Namibia ranks 75th and Saudi Arabia ranks 77th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.