Namibia vs Peru: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Namibia
21.5%
in 2019
Peru
21.7%
in 2019
Namibia rank
75th
Peru rank
73rd
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Namibia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 21.7% against 21.5% in Namibia, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 75th and Peru ranks 73rd of 193 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.8% | 6.6% | 1.8% | Peru |
| 2000s | 9.4% | 13.3% | 3.9% | Peru |
| 2010s | 17.4% | 21.5% | 4.2% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Namibia or Peru?
- Peru, at 21.7% against 21.5% in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Namibia and Peru?
- 0.2%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Peru?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Peru rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Namibia ranks 75th and Peru ranks 73rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.