Mauritius vs Nicaragua: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Mauritius
34.5%
in 2019
Nicaragua
34.7%
in 2019
Mauritius rank
16th
Nicaragua rank
15th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Mauritius
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 34.7% against 34.5% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 16th and Nicaragua ranks 15th of 193 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.8% | 10.9% | 3.1% | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 11.9% | 18.3% | 6.4% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 25.2% | 30.1% | 5.0% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Mauritius or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 34.7% against 34.5% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Mauritius and Nicaragua?
- 0.2%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Nicaragua?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Nicaragua rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Mauritius ranks 16th and Nicaragua ranks 15th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.