Malaysia vs Palestine, State of: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Malaysia
19.3%
in 2019
Palestine, State of
19.1%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
85th
Palestine, State of rank
86th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Malaysia
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 19.3% against 19.1% in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 85th and Palestine, State of ranks 86th of 193 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.7% | 2.3% | 3.4% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 10.1% | 5.9% | 4.2% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 16.7% | 15.2% | 1.5% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Malaysia or Palestine, State of?
- Malaysia, at 19.3% against 19.1% in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Malaysia and Palestine, State of?
- 0.2%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Palestine, State of?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Palestine, State of rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Malaysia ranks 85th and Palestine, State of ranks 86th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.