Malaysia vs Sweden: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Malaysia
19.3%
in 2019
Sweden
19.9%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
85th
Sweden rank
82nd
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Malaysia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 19.9% against 19.3% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 85th and Sweden ranks 82nd of 193 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.7% | 4.2% | 1.5% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 10.1% | 8.9% | 1.2% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 16.7% | 16.7% | 0.0% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Malaysia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 19.9% against 19.3% in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Malaysia and Sweden?
- 0.6%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sweden?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Sweden rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Malaysia ranks 85th and Sweden ranks 82nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.