Malawi vs Papua New Guinea: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Malawi
10.9%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
10.1%
in 2019
Malawi rank
150th
Papua New Guinea rank
153rd
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Malawi
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 10.9% against 10.1% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Malawi ranks 150th and Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd of 193 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.4% | 4.4% | 3.0% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 2.3% | 5.7% | 3.4% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 6.7% | 8.3% | 1.6% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Malawi or Papua New Guinea?
- Malawi, at 10.9% against 10.1% in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.8%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Papua New Guinea rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Malawi ranks 150th and Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.