Lebanon vs New Zealand: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Lebanon
26.9%
in 2019
New Zealand
27.4%
in 2019
Lebanon rank
48th
New Zealand rank
45th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Lebanon
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 27.4% against 26.9% in Lebanon, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Lebanon ranks 48th and New Zealand ranks 45th of 193 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.2% | 10.9% | 3.8% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 13.2% | 21.2% | 8.0% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 23.8% | 27.7% | 4.0% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Lebanon or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 27.4% against 26.9% in Lebanon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Lebanon and New Zealand?
- 0.5%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and New Zealand?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Lebanon and New Zealand rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Lebanon ranks 48th and New Zealand ranks 45th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.