Latvia vs Philippines: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Latvia
17.3%
in 2019
Philippines
17.1%
in 2019
Latvia rank
98th
Philippines rank
99th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Latvia
- Philippines
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 17.3% against 17.1% in Philippines, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Philippines ahead.
Latvia ranks 98th and Philippines ranks 99th of 193 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.4% | 4.1% | 0.3% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 9.3% | 8.2% | 1.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 14.8% | 14.6% | 0.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Latvia or Philippines?
- Latvia, at 17.3% against 17.1% in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Latvia and Philippines?
- 0.2%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Philippines?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Philippines rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Latvia ranks 98th and Philippines ranks 99th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.