Republic of Korea vs Sur: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Republic of Korea
52.6%
in 2019
Sur
21.1%
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
2nd
Sur rank
2nd
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Republic of Korea
- Sur
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 52.6% against 21.1% in Sur, a difference of 31.5%.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 2.5 times Sur's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sur ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.8% | 7.2% | 0.5% | Republic of Korea |
| 2000s | 25.7% | 13.5% | 12.1% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 47.0% | 19.6% | 27.3% | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Republic of Korea or Sur?
- Republic of Korea, at 52.6% against 21.1% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Republic of Korea and Sur?
- 31.5%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Sur?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Sur rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Republic of Korea ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.