Kiribati vs Solomon Islands: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Kiribati
6.6%
in 2019
Solomon Islands
6.5%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
183rd
Solomon Islands rank
184th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Kiribati
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 6.6% against 6.5% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 183rd and Solomon Islands ranks 184th of 193 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.9% | 3.0% | 2.9% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 7.3% | 3.7% | 3.7% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 7.0% | 5.2% | 1.8% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Kiribati or Solomon Islands?
- Kiribati, at 6.6% against 6.5% in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 0.1%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Solomon Islands rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Kiribati ranks 183rd and Solomon Islands ranks 184th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.