Kiribati vs Nepal: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Kiribati
6.6%
in 2019
Nepal
7.2%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
183rd
Nepal rank
180th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Kiribati
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 7.2% against 6.6% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 183rd and Nepal ranks 180th of 193 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.9% | 1.6% | 4.3% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 7.3% | 2.9% | 4.5% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 7.0% | 5.5% | 1.5% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Kiribati or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 7.2% against 6.6% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Kiribati and Nepal?
- 0.6%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nepal?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Nepal rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Kiribati ranks 183rd and Nepal ranks 180th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.