Kenya vs Kiribati: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Kenya
6.2%
in 2019
Kiribati
6.6%
in 2019
Kenya rank
186th
Kiribati rank
183rd
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Kenya
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 6.6% against 6.2% in Kenya, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 186th and Kiribati ranks 183rd of 193 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.5% | 5.9% | 4.4% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 2.3% | 7.3% | 5.0% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 4.5% | 7.0% | 2.5% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Kenya or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 6.6% against 6.2% in Kenya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Kenya and Kiribati?
- 0.4%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Kiribati?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and Kiribati rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Kenya ranks 186th and Kiribati ranks 183rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.