Japan vs Lebanon: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Japan
26.3%
in 2019
Lebanon
26.9%
in 2019
Japan rank
50th
Lebanon rank
48th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Japan
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 26.9% against 26.3% in Japan, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lebanon ahead.
Japan ranks 50th and Lebanon ranks 48th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.9% | 7.2% | 0.3% | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 13.5% | 13.2% | 0.3% | Japan |
| 2010s | 22.9% | 23.8% | 0.8% | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Japan or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 26.9% against 26.3% in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Japan and Lebanon?
- 0.6%, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lebanon?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Lebanon rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Japan ranks 50th and Lebanon ranks 48th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.