Israel vs New Zealand: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Israel
27.2%
in 2019
New Zealand
27.4%
in 2019
Israel rank
46th
New Zealand rank
45th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Israel
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 27.4% against 27.2% in Israel, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 46th and New Zealand ranks 45th of 193 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.1% | 10.9% | 0.8% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 18.1% | 21.2% | 3.1% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 25.9% | 27.7% | 1.8% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Israel or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 27.4% against 27.2% in Israel as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Israel and New Zealand?
- 0.2%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Zealand?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Israel and New Zealand rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Israel ranks 46th and New Zealand ranks 45th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.