Iceland vs Sur: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Iceland
51.8%
in 2019
Sur
21.1%
in 2019
Iceland rank
3rd
Sur rank
2nd
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Iceland
- Sur
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 51.8% against 21.1% in Sur, a difference of 30.7%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 2.5 times Sur's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.0% | 7.2% | 7.8% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 31.7% | 13.5% | 18.2% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 47.9% | 19.6% | 28.3% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Iceland or Sur?
- Iceland, at 51.8% against 21.1% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Iceland and Sur?
- 30.7%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sur?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Sur rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Iceland ranks 3rd and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.