Iceland vs Mus: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled) … 30-79
Iceland
51.8%
in 2019
Mus
34.5%
in 2019
Iceland rank
3rd
Mus rank
1st
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled) … 30-79 over time
- Iceland
- Mus
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 51.8% against 34.5% in Mus, a difference of 17.3%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.5 times Mus's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 3rd and Mus ranks 1st of 193 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Mus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.0% | 7.8% | 7.2% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 31.7% | 11.9% | 19.8% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 47.9% | 25.2% | 22.7% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Iceland or Mus?
- Iceland, at 51.8% against 34.5% in Mus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Iceland and Mus?
- 17.3%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mus?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Mus rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Iceland ranks 3rd and Mus ranks 1st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.