Iceland vs Republic of Korea: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Iceland
51.8%
in 2019
Republic of Korea
52.6%
in 2019
Iceland rank
3rd
Republic of Korea rank
2nd
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Iceland
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 52.6% against 51.8% in Iceland, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 3rd and Republic of Korea ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.0% | 7.8% | 7.2% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 31.7% | 25.7% | 6.0% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 47.9% | 47.0% | 0.9% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Iceland or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 52.6% against 51.8% in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Iceland and Republic of Korea?
- 0.8%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Republic of Korea?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Republic of Korea rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Iceland ranks 3rd and Republic of Korea ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.