Guatemala vs Malaysia: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Guatemala
19.1%
in 2019
Malaysia
19.3%
in 2019
Guatemala rank
86th
Malaysia rank
85th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Guatemala
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 19.3% against 19.1% in Guatemala, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 86th and Malaysia ranks 85th of 193 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.5% | 5.7% | 2.2% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 6.5% | 10.1% | 3.6% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 14.7% | 16.7% | 2.0% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Guatemala or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 19.3% against 19.1% in Guatemala as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Guatemala and Malaysia?
- 0.2%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Malaysia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Malaysia rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Guatemala ranks 86th and Malaysia ranks 85th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.