Georgia vs Latvia: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Georgia
17.0%
in 2019
Latvia
17.3%
in 2019
Georgia rank
100th
Latvia rank
98th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Georgia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 17.3% against 17.0% in Georgia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 98th of 193 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.2% | 4.4% | 1.8% | Georgia |
| 2000s | 11.2% | 9.3% | 1.9% | Georgia |
| 2010s | 15.5% | 14.8% | 0.7% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Georgia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 17.3% against 17.0% in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Georgia and Latvia?
- 0.3%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Georgia ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 98th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.