Finland vs Panama: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Finland
27.7%
in 2019
Panama
28.5%
in 2019
Finland rank
43rd
Panama rank
40th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Finland
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 28.5% against 27.7% in Finland, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Panama ahead.
Finland ranks 43rd and Panama ranks 40th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.9% | 7.9% | 1.0% | Panama |
| 2000s | 17.5% | 13.5% | 4.0% | Finland |
| 2010s | 26.4% | 23.9% | 2.5% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Finland or Panama?
- Panama, at 28.5% against 27.7% in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Finland and Panama?
- 0.8%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Panama?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Panama rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Finland ranks 43rd and Panama ranks 40th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.