Finland vs New Zealand: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Finland
27.7%
in 2019
New Zealand
27.4%
in 2019
Finland rank
43rd
New Zealand rank
45th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Finland
- New Zealand
How they compare
Finland currently reports 27.7% against 27.4% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Zealand ahead.
Finland ranks 43rd and New Zealand ranks 45th of 193 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.9% | 10.9% | 4.0% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 17.5% | 21.2% | 3.7% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 26.4% | 27.7% | 1.3% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Finland or New Zealand?
- Finland, at 27.7% against 27.4% in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Finland and New Zealand?
- 0.3%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Finland ranks 43rd and New Zealand ranks 45th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.