Fiji vs Lithuania: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Fiji
12.6%
in 2019
Lithuania
12.7%
in 2019
Fiji rank
130th
Lithuania rank
129th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Fiji
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 12.7% against 12.6% in Fiji, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 130th and Lithuania ranks 129th of 193 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.3% | 2.2% | 5.1% | Fiji |
| 2000s | 9.4% | 5.9% | 3.5% | Fiji |
| 2010s | 11.3% | 10.4% | 0.8% | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Fiji or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 12.7% against 12.6% in Fiji as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Fiji and Lithuania?
- 0.1%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Lithuania?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Fiji and Lithuania rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Fiji ranks 130th and Lithuania ranks 129th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.