Estonia vs Myanmar: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Estonia
15.7%
in 2019
Myanmar
15.0%
in 2019
Estonia rank
107th
Myanmar rank
110th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Estonia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 15.7% against 15.0% in Myanmar, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Myanmar ahead.
Estonia ranks 107th and Myanmar ranks 110th of 193 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.7% | 4.2% | 0.5% | Estonia |
| 2000s | 9.4% | 7.8% | 1.5% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 13.7% | 13.1% | 0.7% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Estonia or Myanmar?
- Estonia, at 15.7% against 15.0% in Myanmar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Estonia and Myanmar?
- 0.7%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Myanmar?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Myanmar rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Estonia ranks 107th and Myanmar ranks 110th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.