El Salvador vs Malta: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
El Salvador
39.4%
in 2019
Malta
44.9%
in 2019
El Salvador rank
9th
Malta rank
7th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- El Salvador
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 44.9% against 39.4% in El Salvador, a difference of 5.5%.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 9th and Malta ranks 7th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.0% | 13.3% | 0.7% | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 23.3% | 24.8% | 1.4% | Malta |
| 2010s | 35.5% | 40.1% | 4.6% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), El Salvador or Malta?
- Malta, at 44.9% against 39.4% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between El Salvador and Malta?
- 5.5%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Malta?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Malta rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- El Salvador ranks 9th and Malta ranks 7th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.