Costa Rica vs Sur: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Costa Rica
49.7%
in 2019
Sur
21.1%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
4th
Sur rank
2nd
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Costa Rica
- Sur
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 49.7% against 21.1% in Sur, a difference of 28.6%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 2.4 times Sur's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 4th and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.7% | 7.2% | 4.5% | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 21.4% | 13.5% | 7.9% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 41.1% | 19.6% | 21.5% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Costa Rica or Sur?
- Costa Rica, at 49.7% against 21.1% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Costa Rica and Sur?
- 28.6%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sur?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Sur rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Costa Rica ranks 4th and Sur ranks 2nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.