Costa Rica vs Malta: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Costa Rica
49.7%
in 2019
Malta
44.9%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
4th
Malta rank
7th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Costa Rica
- Malta
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 49.7% against 44.9% in Malta, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 4th and Malta ranks 7th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.7% | 13.3% | 1.6% | Malta |
| 2000s | 21.4% | 24.8% | 3.3% | Malta |
| 2010s | 41.1% | 40.1% | 1.1% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Costa Rica or Malta?
- Costa Rica, at 49.7% against 44.9% in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Costa Rica and Malta?
- 4.8%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malta?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Malta rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Costa Rica ranks 4th and Malta ranks 7th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.