Cook Islands vs Zimbabwe: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Cook Islands
16.7%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
16.5%
in 2019
Cook Islands rank
101st
Zimbabwe rank
103rd
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Cook Islands
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 16.7% against 16.5% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Cook Islands has been ahead every year.
Cook Islands ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 103rd of 193 countries.
Cook Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.2% | 3.9% | 5.2% | Cook Islands |
| 2000s | 12.6% | 7.3% | 5.3% | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 15.4% | 13.2% | 2.2% | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Cook Islands or Zimbabwe?
- Cook Islands, at 16.7% against 16.5% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Cook Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2%, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Cook Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Cook Islands ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 103rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.