Chile vs Nicaragua: Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)
Chile
33.7%
in 2019
Nicaragua
34.7%
in 2019
Chile rank
17th
Nicaragua rank
15th
Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) over time
- Chile
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 34.7% against 33.7% in Chile, a difference of 1.0%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 17th and Nicaragua ranks 15th of 193 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.6% | 10.9% | 1.3% | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 17.9% | 18.3% | 0.4% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 29.5% | 30.1% | 0.6% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension), Chile or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 34.7% against 33.7% in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) between Chile and Nicaragua?
- 1.0%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nicaragua?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Nicaragua rank globally for hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension)?
- Chile ranks 17th and Nicaragua ranks 15th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.